Take eloquence, and wring its neck, as Overlain had proposed, or rather ordered, and had proven to be possible:
At a minimum, we would expect a rigorous examination of the following: Equally rigorous and systematic remarks about the differences between poetry and other art forms, such as music and painting, would be in order, as would reflection on the relation between orally delivered poetry Poetry vs rhetoric, if we are to include performance, poetry that is in one way or Poetry vs rhetoric enacted and poetry communicated through the written word.
And yet Plato clearly thought that something of enormous importance hangs on his assessment of poetry, something that goes significantly beyond getting the details of the subject pinned down in a philosophically respectable fashion.
The scope of the quarrel, especially in the Republic, also indicates that for Plato what is at stake is a clash between what we might call comprehensive world-views; it seems that matters of grave importance in ethics, politics, metaphysics, theology, and epistemology are at stake.
The praisers of Homer treat him as the font of wisdom. And since Homer shaped the popular culture of the times, Plato is setting himself against popular culture as he knew it.
He is addressing not just fans of Homer but fans of the sort of thing that Homer does and conveys. The critique is presented as a trans-historical one. It seems that Plato was the first to articulate the quarrel in so sweeping a fashion.
It is not easy to understand what Plato means by poetry, why it is an opponent, whether it is dangerous because of its form or content or both, and whether there is much of ongoing interest or relevance in his account. These questions are complicated by the fact that Plato was not or, not primarily thinking of poetry as a written text read in silence; he had in mind recitations or performances, often experienced in the context of theater.
Television and movie actors enjoy a degree of status and wealth in modern society that transcends anything known in the ancient world. When we turn to the second theme under consideration, viz. What do philosophers have to say about rhetoric? Generally speaking, very little qua philosophers.
Like all reflective people, philosophers dislike rhetoric as it is commonly practiced, bemoan the decline of public speech into mere persuasion and demagoguery, and generally think of themselves as avoiding rhetoric in favor of careful analysis and argument. Consequently, philosophers, especially in modernity, have had little to say about rhetoric.
By contrast, Aristotle devoted a book to the topic. And Plato struggles with rhetoric—or sophistry as it is sometimes also called, although the two are not necessarily identical—repeatedly. We recall that Socrates was put to death in part because he was suspected of being a sophist, a clever rhetorician who twists words and makes the weaker argument into the stronger and teaches others to do the same.
What is it about? Once again, the question is surprisingly difficult.
It is not easy to understand why the topic is so important to Plato, what the essential issues in the quarrel are, and whether rhetoric is always a bad thing.
These were rhetorical, but were they merely rhetorical, let alone sophistical?
These remarks prompt yet another question. However interesting the topics of poetry and rhetoric may be, when we read Plato, why group them together?A rhetorical device is any language that helps an author or speaker achieve a particular purpose (usually persuasion, since rhetoric is typically defined as the art of persuasion).
But “rhetorical device” is an extremely broad term, and can include techniques for generating emotion, beauty, and spiritual significance as well as persuasion.
Rhetoric Definition. Rhetoric is a technique of using language effectively and persuasively in spoken or written form. It is an art of discourse, which studies and employs various methods to convince, influence, or please an audience. from the Earlhamite, Fall The Difference Between Poetry and Rhetoric It’s been an off and on tradition to publish the text of the year’s Baccalaureate address in the alphabetnyc.com spring.
Poem vs Poetry Literary works are created for the purpose of providing people with information, entertainment and inspiration. They have been around for as long as the ancient times.
Most were orally handed down from generation to generation and others were found inscribed on monoliths, runestones and stelae. There are. Both have been subjected to criticism throughout history: Plato for instance, rejected poetry because, among other things, it did not provide true knowledge and similarly, certain modernist poets renounce rhetoric for being deceptive speech (Nicholls ).
is that rhetoric is while poetic is poetic (relating to poetry). As a noun rhetoric is the art of using language, especially public speaking, as a means to persuade.